Ivan Dreycopp vs Aron Paul Samson Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 Aug at 10:08 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
I. Dreycopp vs A. Paul Samson

ARG
1
Win
Played
0
Win

IND
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Dreycopp 1 - 0 Samson
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ivan Dreycopp winning 2 and Aron Paul Samson winning 0. The last match between Ivan Dreycopp and Aron Paul Samson was at the M25 Monastir, 12-08-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Ivan Dreycopp getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Dreycopp | 1 |
| Samson | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) M25 Monastir(08-12-25)
I. Dreycopp vs A. P. Samson H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 60.00% (24-16) | Career Total W/L | 10.81% (4-33) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
I. Dreycopp vs A. P. Samson Match Preview:
- Second Serve Strength: Dreycopp claims a 36.5% success rate on second serve points over the last six months, while Samson has not won any. Could this indicate a notable advantage for Dreycopp?
- Return Game Comparison: When facing opponents' second serves recently, Dreycopp has captured 45.86% of points. Samson again registers a 0% success rate, suggesting a strong return game edge for Dreycopp.
- Under Pressure: Dreycopp has successfully rescued 53.85% of breakpoints, but Samson hasn't saved any, highlighting Dreycopp's resilience in crucial moments.
- Overall Match Wins: Over the past year, Dreycopp has emerged victorious in 66.67% of matches played, compared to Samson's 27.27% win rate, implying greater consistency.
- Surface Performance: Both players favor hard courts, but Dreycopp boasts a 64% win rate versus Samson's 13%, suggesting Dreycopp is better suited on this surface.
- Competitive Level: Dreycopp competes frequently at Futures/Satellites with a commendable 66.67% win rate, whereas Samson holds a 27.27% win rate at the same level, indicating a competitive edge for Dreycopp.
- Deciding Set Performance: In deciding sets over the last year, Dreycopp succeeds 67% of the time, as opposed to Samson's 0%, pointing to Dreycopp's ability to close out tight matches.
- Breaking Serve: Dreycopp converts 42.31% of break opportunities in recent matches, while Samson remains at 0%, indicating Dreycopp is more aggressive in capitalizing on chances.
Editorial Prediction (August 12, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match showcases a stark contrast between Dreycopp's strong second serve and return game against Samson's underperformance in these areas. Dreycopp's ability to convert on breakpoints and defend them under pressure further underscores their adeptness in critical phases of play.
Considering the recent form and overall statistics, Dreycopp displays a consistent edge, boasting higher match win rates and competence on hard courts, the surface of choice for both competitors. Additionally, their capacity to perform in deciding sets could be a decisive factor should the match extend to the final phase.
Based on current data and trends, Dreycopp is strongly favored to claim victory over Samson in this encounter.
Ivan Dreycopp vs Aron Paul Samson Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
I. Dreycopp vs A. P. Samson H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:22:38 | Average Match Time | 1:22:38 |
| 76% (31/41) | 1st Serve % | 57% (28/49) |
| 87% (27/31) | 1st Serve Win % | 46% (13/28) |
| 60% (6/10) | 2nd Serve Win % | 62% (13/21) |
| 80% (4/5) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (23/49) | Return Points Win % | 20% (8/41) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
I. Dreycopp Recent Matches Played
A. P. Samson Recent Matches Played

I. Dreycopp vs A. P. Samson Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.00% (24/16) | YTD Win/Loss | 10.81% (4/33) |
| 60.92% (53/34) | Sets Win/Loss | 9.59% (7/66) |
| 54.88% (433/356) | Games Win/Loss | 31.10% (186/412) |
| 61.11% (11/7) | Hard Win/Loss | 10.71% (3/25) |
| 61.90% (13/8) | Clay Win/Loss | 11.11% (1/8) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.02 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 7 | Aces Total | 0 |
| 0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 0 |
| 42 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 38.42 | Average Opponent Rank | 0 |
| 68% (703/1040) | 1st Serve % | 57% (28/49) |
| 59% (416/703) | 1st Serve Win % | 46% (13/28) |
| 47% (157/337) | 2nd Serve Win % | 62% (13/21) |
| 47% (58/123) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 43% (435/1007) | Return Points Win % | 20% (8/41) |
| 60.00% (24/16) | Futures W/L | 10.81% (4/33) |
| 60% (24/40) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 9% (3/35) |
| 50% (2/4) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 29% (2/7) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 81% (27/22) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (4/4) |
| 19% (27/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (4/0) |
| 15% (13/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (33/0) |